Why are “Transwomen” More Prone to Violent and Sexual Crimes than Normal Men?
YouTube is notorious for being infested by Woke activists and, therefore, suppressing videos that these activists don’t like. Even knowing this, I was amazed late last week at the brazen way in which YouTube buried a particular video of mine. But, thinking about it, I can see why. It was inspired by an opening of Pandora’s Box (Pandora being a biological woman) which will, hopefully, allow society to once again understand the true nature of trans people.
On 16th April, the British Supreme Court made a ruling that has shaken Sir Keir Starmer and his ilk, who have long insisted that “Transwomen are real women” and that “Some women have penises.” Possibly realising that a serious backlash against Woke could lead to the Blairite judges themselves being swept away in a based revolution and feeling a tactical retreat was in order, the Supreme Court judges unanimously ruled that, in the 2010 Equality Act, the word “woman” exclusively referred to biological women. This was the case because, clearly, in all previous legislation, that is what was meant by “woman.” In other words, so-called “Gender Recognition” certificates be damned; a “woman” is, in English Law, a biological woman, and a transwoman is a man whether they’ve had surgery or not; something that everybody knows deep down, even transwomen, which is why they become so enraged and triggered.
As the three interviewees in my suppressed video – feminist philosopher Nina Power, anti-Tavistock campaigner and cancelled psychiatric nurse Amy Gallagher, and cancelled Philosophy student Connie Shaw – made clear, this ruling has serious consequences: Transwomen can, and perhaps should, be banned from women’s spaces: sports, changing rooms, public loos, organisations, and positive discrimination hiring. I published the interview on YouTube and noticed that it got half as many views as I usually get. So, I republished it but bleeped out all the words relating to trans: Viewing numbers were back to normal. The ruling was a defeat for leftists, who we know from studies are highly Neurotic and, hence, high in Narcissistic Personality Disorder: they tell themselves they are perfect and require adulation. Highly entitled, defeat confronts them with their true self, resulting in “Narcissistic Rage,” so you can see why they’d suppress such videos.
Narcissistic Rage was the essence of the reaction of trans campaigners to this ruling: Furious marches in which opponents were branded as Fascists, placards calling for the murder of TERFs (Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists) and the assassination of J.K. Rowling, the vandalising of a statue of a suffragette (perhaps resentful of the fact that Millicent Fawcett was an actual woman), and, most tellingly of all, biological men (who insist they’re women and should be allowed into women’s spaces) urinating in the street, like drunken men do. This is especially interesting because women cannot urinate in the street, at least not easily, and animals mark their territory via urination.
Overtly, their public pissing was a way of saying, “We’ll go to the loo wherever we wish, including in women’s loos.” But, covertly, it was lost on none of us that it was a way of expressing contempt for power and tradition (this was near parliament) and an intimidating means of conveying their power, entitlement, and frightening mental instability. Such behaviour highlights exactly why transwomen should not be allowed in women’s spaces.
“But aren’t transwomen just unfortunate people born in the wrong bodies?” you might ask. In a small minority of cases, the answer is, in a sense: ‘Yes.’ These are homosexual transsexuals: extremely feminised males who, all their lives, seem to feel that they are female. This being so, they are sexually attracted to biological men. An example is Glasgow University graduate Evelyn Grant, whom I have twice interviewed on The Jolly Heretic, to the fury of some viewers who felt that Evelyn’s very presence somehow polluted their online pub.
However, the vast majority of them, at least three-quarters, are, in the words of the transwoman psychologist Anne Lawrence, “Men Trapped in Men’s Bodies,” this being the title of Lawrence’s book on the subject. They are autogynephilic transsexuals: They are men who are sexually aroused by the idea of themselves as women and, to varying degrees, obsessed with this idea. Naturally, this develops in adolescence, not childhood. In many cases, they do not go so far as seeking gender reassignment. They can be happily married but, for example, will only be able to ejaculate, when having sex with their wives, by imagining that they are their wives having sex with them. There is a direct and strong correlation between how erect their penis gets and how convincingly they can imagine they don’t have one. Intrusive thoughts of being a woman decrease, for a period, after they ejaculate, before gradually starting to return.
In a sense, they are sexually aroused by themselves. This does sound rather Narcissistic. I have explored this fetish in my book Breeding the Human Herd: Eugenics, Dysgenics, and the Future of the Species. One study found that 80 per cent of post-operation transwomen suffered from a personality disorder and, in most cases, this was Narcissistic Personality Disorder, a condition far more common among males than females and one which, as we have seen, leads to Narcissistic Rage if sufferers don’t get their way. This is laughably evident in the reaction to the ruling. Clearly, people capable of such resentful fury should be kept out of women’s spaces. Presumably, the less Narcissistic transsexuals don’t transition, or even demand to be treated as women, as this will clearly discombobulate and disgust their relatives and society at large, as Prof. J. Michael Bailey, who researches this issue, pointed out when I interviewed him.
They know, deep down, that they are men, so why would they want to be in women’s spaces? I assume it is to be given a sense of reassurance that they are women, but they are the ones forcing people to give them this, like a man forcing a woman to say, “I love you.” Thus, it can only be about power: They want to be a woman, they resent the fact that women get to be women and they don’t, so they will force these people to overtly accept that they are women, even though, of course, they are not women and these women don’t accept that they are: Narcissistic Entitlement.
But it gets worse. As I showed in a study some years ago - “Gender Dysphoria and Transgender Identity Is Associated with Physiological and Psychological Masculinisation,” transwomen, especially pre-hormone therapy, are, ironically, the most masculine kinds of men there can be. They are extremely high in testosterone.
This is evidenced by elevation in a number of testosterone markers: left-handedness, 2D:4D ratio (masculinised hand shape), and strong sexual attraction to females; once they transition, they tend to be lesbians. They are also high in autism, another testosterone marker which reflects a male brain. This renders them interested in things rather than people, highly sensitive to stimuli (leading to a desire to make sense of a chaotic world, to systematise), and obsessive (as this provides a safe anchor and reflects a desire to systematise).
Combined with their very high sex drive, this means that they easily make sexual associations and develop fetishes, with which they will become obsessed, and it also makes them prone to anxiety, as they can be overwhelmed by stimuli. Excluded, due to autism, they can develop low self-esteem and deal with this via Narcissistic Personality Disorder, ending up sexually aroused by themselves but also by women. In other words, these are the worst kinds of men to have in women’s spaces: high testosterone means low impulse control, poor temper, low Agreeableness, and high sex drive. Add to this Narcissistic entitlement and rage, and you’re asking for serious trouble. Hence, in the UK, 71% of transwomen prisoners are in jail for violent or sexual crimes, compared to 53% of so-called “cis-men.”
The response of the Left to the ruling has been two fold: To dishonestly state that they never said women could have penises (in other words, they are in denial because they know they’ve lost this one, and they can’t quite believe it), or to assert that it marginalises further a marginalised group. But as the trans reaction and the studies show, these are Narcissistic and aggressive people or, at least, the ones who want to use women’s spaces and publically look like women are. In any civilised society, men like this should be marginalised.
For more based-science analysis of society and politics, become a subscriber at JollyHeretic.com!
Did you miss the last Dutton’s Digest? Click below:
Is there enough data to calculate how much more of a threat to women is presented by a trans-woman compared to the threat presented to women by a random white man? If a trans-woman enters a women's changing room, how few men must there be in the men's changing room for the cis-women to be statistically safer if they left the women's changing room and changed in the men's changing room? And by allowing a trans-woman into a women's changing room, have the men in the men's changing room become less of a risk to women because they have been filtered by allowing one high risk man to go from the men's to the women's changing room?
Please do an interview with Blaire White and discuss this!