I am a woman, but since I was about 12 it became clear that I have a more masculine temperament. I have always been based. I find it easier to make friends with men. I cringe when I listen to Ed's analysis, because I know it's true.
While some female politicians such as Giorgia Meloni and Christine Anderson are clearly based like myself, I have to ask myself the uncomfortable question of whether female participation in politics and public affairs has actually become a net negative.
While maybe not relevant anymore, I'm curious about the psychology behind Walz. He reminds me of the doll people from Coraline. Comes off as a humble, simple, warm-hearted family man, then beneath the surface is a woke zealot who blatantly lies to convince people to give him power. Sociopathic charm?
He's clearly controlled by whatever it is they have on him. Looking at his performances he is talentless, not very bright and will read out whatever is pushed in front of him. I also doubt he has a moral foundation.
Ed handled Kamala extensively in previous post. How about Hillary?
She didnt seem suffering same problems or woke as Bill shielded her. But over years in jetset DC life had changed her. Hillary seems workaholic, even bragged in one doc early years of career, which suggests some trauma in psyche, thus work is like drug.
I thought why in women sports, where it is almost apology to loosing team that your team is better, would play "punching up" type activism increased over years for US soccer(football) team captain. Is that way of coping she was so clearly better and had ego which is must to win anything? Those claims were clearly absurd so internal group logic could explain that there was little room to do it or destabilize team and loose your captain status. Aint women naturally more communistic, "hit the nail down that sticks up" type (saying from china or similar version in japan too)...
So instead of giving your paycheck equalized to team mates, demand someone else from outside gives some subsidy to your team mates(this seems common logic in female dominated groups lobbying in society) ?
In general women seem more apt to keep illogical, dissonance type dual mental models (our team deserves this, others deserve much worse, which seemed Hillary logic).
I am a woman, but since I was about 12 it became clear that I have a more masculine temperament. I have always been based. I find it easier to make friends with men. I cringe when I listen to Ed's analysis, because I know it's true.
While some female politicians such as Giorgia Meloni and Christine Anderson are clearly based like myself, I have to ask myself the uncomfortable question of whether female participation in politics and public affairs has actually become a net negative.
While maybe not relevant anymore, I'm curious about the psychology behind Walz. He reminds me of the doll people from Coraline. Comes off as a humble, simple, warm-hearted family man, then beneath the surface is a woke zealot who blatantly lies to convince people to give him power. Sociopathic charm?
He's clearly controlled by whatever it is they have on him. Looking at his performances he is talentless, not very bright and will read out whatever is pushed in front of him. I also doubt he has a moral foundation.
Ed handled Kamala extensively in previous post. How about Hillary?
She didnt seem suffering same problems or woke as Bill shielded her. But over years in jetset DC life had changed her. Hillary seems workaholic, even bragged in one doc early years of career, which suggests some trauma in psyche, thus work is like drug.
I thought why in women sports, where it is almost apology to loosing team that your team is better, would play "punching up" type activism increased over years for US soccer(football) team captain. Is that way of coping she was so clearly better and had ego which is must to win anything? Those claims were clearly absurd so internal group logic could explain that there was little room to do it or destabilize team and loose your captain status. Aint women naturally more communistic, "hit the nail down that sticks up" type (saying from china or similar version in japan too)...
So instead of giving your paycheck equalized to team mates, demand someone else from outside gives some subsidy to your team mates(this seems common logic in female dominated groups lobbying in society) ?
In general women seem more apt to keep illogical, dissonance type dual mental models (our team deserves this, others deserve much worse, which seemed Hillary logic).