These days one of the Left's favorite questions to justify the transgender madness is "What is a woman?" -- as if that's so profound and deep. The answer is very simple: Anyone with Y chromosome is male, and anyone without is a female/woman. And this can be ascertained in about 5 minutes flat from a buccal swab. So, one might be led to believe that the phenotypical differences b/w the sexes might be hard-codes in the sex chromosomes... but this has been shown not to be true. What then does have the greatest effect on sexual phenotype? HORMONES. Numerous studies have shown that the fetus's exposure to Testosterone vs. Estrogen is ultimately what influences sexual phenotypes... sex organs, the way the brain works, the way the child/person ultimately thinks, behaves, and views the world. Usually these -- the sex chromosomes and the Test vs. Est balance are consistent, indeed it is the sex chromosomes that determine this, but in exceptional situations -- e.g. hormone-secreting tumors, external endocrine disruptors like atrazine -- everything goes haywire... and the fetus develops into the "wrong" sex. I'll share an excellent excerpt about this from a recent book I read in a separate post.
My point by all this is that HORMONES, particularly sex hormones, are critically important for normal, healthy human function and behavior. And anything that disrupts these and their normal ebbs and flows WILL HAVE SIDE EFFECTS. Anyone notice the rise of feminism and especially radical feminism in the past 50 years? While some is undoubtedly bc of govt propaganda (after all, more women working = more taxes and bigger govt), I wonder how this tracks with OCP use? And of course, as Professor Dutton has written about, the rise of feminism is one the early hallmarks of a societal decline.
Anyway, my view is that women who just want to have promiscuous sex likely don't have great genes anyway, so as long as they don't have children, let them have at it. And to ensure they don't have children, let's pay them to get tubal ligations: https://childfreebc.com/candidates/. I encourage everyone I know to donate there and share that service. Feminism is just another manifestation of Dysgenics. And to combat that we need equally strong EUGENICS, like CBC offers.
Women as part of the mothering instinct inherently have a view that things will turn out alright in times of crisis, like when we are children and a small cut on the knee is something dramatic. It's an important part of what makes a good mother and as the saying goes, a good wife.
It's also what makes women a poor choice in involving high-stakes decision making, where things frequently don't turn out right and often with disastrous results.
People don't appreciate how much a part women being elevated into those roles has had on the decline of politics and everything else over the last 60 years, which also coincides with the introduction of the pill. A very bad combination having someone in a decision making role who not only can't foresee bad consequences, but has no fear of them either. Find a better explanation for the some of insanity we are living with if you can.
The pill and casual abortion have also made women more course and sterile in what makes them our "better half'", or being on the side of the angels. The pill and abortion have made women indifferent to murder and death, and virtue to have lost any meaning.
It is compounded by something else lost. No longer our valuable counterpart, women have become an analog of men but without our valuable traits, one of those being integrity. That abstract concept is missing in women for the obvious reason. For women, fighting for their children and retaining their mate is all out war, whatever it takes. That instinct is an important part of what makes women women, but another negative in the system that once held things together, relative to now anyway. Taken together, the pill, abortion, and feminist dogma have created a dangerous new being.
These days one of the Left's favorite questions to justify the transgender madness is "What is a woman?" -- as if that's so profound and deep. The answer is very simple: Anyone with Y chromosome is male, and anyone without is a female/woman. And this can be ascertained in about 5 minutes flat from a buccal swab. So, one might be led to believe that the phenotypical differences b/w the sexes might be hard-codes in the sex chromosomes... but this has been shown not to be true. What then does have the greatest effect on sexual phenotype? HORMONES. Numerous studies have shown that the fetus's exposure to Testosterone vs. Estrogen is ultimately what influences sexual phenotypes... sex organs, the way the brain works, the way the child/person ultimately thinks, behaves, and views the world. Usually these -- the sex chromosomes and the Test vs. Est balance are consistent, indeed it is the sex chromosomes that determine this, but in exceptional situations -- e.g. hormone-secreting tumors, external endocrine disruptors like atrazine -- everything goes haywire... and the fetus develops into the "wrong" sex. I'll share an excellent excerpt about this from a recent book I read in a separate post.
My point by all this is that HORMONES, particularly sex hormones, are critically important for normal, healthy human function and behavior. And anything that disrupts these and their normal ebbs and flows WILL HAVE SIDE EFFECTS. Anyone notice the rise of feminism and especially radical feminism in the past 50 years? While some is undoubtedly bc of govt propaganda (after all, more women working = more taxes and bigger govt), I wonder how this tracks with OCP use? And of course, as Professor Dutton has written about, the rise of feminism is one the early hallmarks of a societal decline.
Anyway, my view is that women who just want to have promiscuous sex likely don't have great genes anyway, so as long as they don't have children, let them have at it. And to ensure they don't have children, let's pay them to get tubal ligations: https://childfreebc.com/candidates/. I encourage everyone I know to donate there and share that service. Feminism is just another manifestation of Dysgenics. And to combat that we need equally strong EUGENICS, like CBC offers.
Women as part of the mothering instinct inherently have a view that things will turn out alright in times of crisis, like when we are children and a small cut on the knee is something dramatic. It's an important part of what makes a good mother and as the saying goes, a good wife.
It's also what makes women a poor choice in involving high-stakes decision making, where things frequently don't turn out right and often with disastrous results.
People don't appreciate how much a part women being elevated into those roles has had on the decline of politics and everything else over the last 60 years, which also coincides with the introduction of the pill. A very bad combination having someone in a decision making role who not only can't foresee bad consequences, but has no fear of them either. Find a better explanation for the some of insanity we are living with if you can.
The pill and casual abortion have also made women more course and sterile in what makes them our "better half'", or being on the side of the angels. The pill and abortion have made women indifferent to murder and death, and virtue to have lost any meaning.
It is compounded by something else lost. No longer our valuable counterpart, women have become an analog of men but without our valuable traits, one of those being integrity. That abstract concept is missing in women for the obvious reason. For women, fighting for their children and retaining their mate is all out war, whatever it takes. That instinct is an important part of what makes women women, but another negative in the system that once held things together, relative to now anyway. Taken together, the pill, abortion, and feminist dogma have created a dangerous new being.